Monday, September 10, 2018

Bringing Back the ‘Shehanshah Yug’ - Who is Responsible?

Let us face it.  

We can never find a solution by hiding or denying the problem.

We all talk about how things – our ways and customs have changed over the period of time and sometimes, there seems to be a feeling of unrest as well over how things are being done now days. We keep comparing the current situation with old times. We talk about bringing back the ‘Shehanshah’s Yug’ again. 
We talk about how people were ‘Sat-bachani’ in those days.
We talk about how there used to be so much Shradha; respect for elders and seniors - genuine love for all - 
and that all of these seem to have disappeared now.

But who is responsible for all this? 

        We all are. 
                       We Are All Responsible for the change.

We usually criticize and complain about what is happening these days. We attack and blame others for what has happened. 
But have we really tried to understand why things were different before? 
Why the attitudes of people were different in olden days? 
Why they were Sat-bachani?
Why there was so much Shradhaa and respect? 
One reason is that the people who came into the mission in those days, were real seekers. They had spent years searching for the Truth – reading the Holy Scriptures for answers, going to their respective religious places with ample faith and genuine respect -  doing Seva at those places to the best of their abilities with utmost respect and devotion. So, when they found the Truth and Gyana in the Mission, they were struck with awe and felt utmost and genuine respect for the Guru and all other fellow saints. Many danced in ecstasy with love - because they had found what they had been looking for – they found happiness and peace. The mission became their life - and their life became the mission.

Then the times changed. 

Because of the publicity and media, crowds of people started to come with the attitude of - ‘let’s see what’s this all about’. Some of them might have been the real seekers, but many - simply after seeing the multitudes of gatherings, decided to join this new and growing organization for different reasons – or just to become part of a beautiful, growing and loving community.
Now, there cannot be a genuine respect and sense of sacrifice if there is no genuine spiritual reason to join a divine movement. So, as the famous saying goes: ‘the quality decreases when the quantity increases’- the overall level of spiritualty inevitably started to go down when the huge multitudes of crowds started to join the mission. Eventually, this simple spiritual organization became so big that it had no other choice than to work like a corporation to handle its affairs properly and efficiently. Management and discipline issues became more prominent than the spiritual talks and debates.

But this is only one side of the problem.
There is always another side to every story, or every situation.

In those early days, those seekers turned saints – who were willing to sacrifice everything to help spread the Truth, were actually groomed and encouraged to do so. They were groomed to become ‘saints’. They were guided and encouraged to spend more time in Sumiran – meditation. It was like apprenticeship. All those old and great saints we usually talk about, used to travel with Baba Avtar Singh ji in trains and in buses as a group. People used to see them as a group of saints and many would want to know about them and their Guru. The tradition continued even later, when they started travelling in a convey of cars. 
This system worked well in two ways:
First: Those who were accompanying Baba Avtar Singh ji on regular basis - knowingly or unknowingly – were being groomed into sainthood. 
Secondly….
With the increased number of devotees, it became extremely difficult for masses – for individual devotees to keep a one to one relation or a personal contact with the Guru. But Shehanshah ji was always accompanied by few great saints who sat in different small groups of newcomers, seekers – to answer their spiritual queries – to satisfy their curiosity. This way – intentionally or unintentionally - the second line of Guru like saints had been prepared, who were admired, looked upon and revered almost like the Guru himself. 
Shehanshah ji used to become extremely happy whenever he was told that the Saints; his senior disciples were treated just like him.
Many serious seekers just as myself would try to stay in the company of those saints - to serve them and to learn from them with respect. It worked like ‘apprenticeship’ for the future preachers also. Just by being with them and observing them closely had a great impact on many who stayed in their company.
This sort of apprenticeship for the younger – or elderly new ‘would be preachers’ continued with the senior saints for a while. They were encouraged to study and speak from the Scriptures and they learned proper ways and life style of a Pracharak by observing the senior saints closely. 
When we used to accompany Bhapa Ram Chand ji of Kapurthala and Sant Amar Singh ji of Patiala during their Prachar tours, they used to guide us how to speak with humility, treat everyone with respect and to adjust in every situation just as they did themselves. They never asked for anything from the hosts– even such small and common things as salt or sugar and taught us to do the same. We were taught to accept everything happily and graciously that was offered to us. 
“It is not our right – that we ought to be served” they said. “It is not their duty to serve us – it’s the kindness of their heart that they serve us with respect - so accept everything that is being offered to you - with humility and gratitude.” 
At times, we were even scolded if we did not eat and accepted gratefully what was offered to us - or if any expression of rejection appeared on our face - or if someone asked for something. Later, they will teach us that if you want to do Prachar then you must be ready to give up your comforts and desires. You can eat your favorite dishes or food of your choice at your home. But when you come for Prachar, then eat whatever is offered to you - sleep at whatever place or bed is provided to you. This is a Prachar tour - not a pleasure trip for sight seeing or something. 

I don’t know how, but somewhere along the line, we lost that tradition of apprenticeship - creating and grooming of a second line of ‘Guru like Saints’. Shehanshah ji used to insist that the senior saints - especially the one who bestowed the Gyan to us - should be given utmost respect and be treated just like him. Today, however, the feelings have changed. Everyone is considered a sevadaar. We say that we should learn from every one but don't want to consider anyone a teacher - because no one is supposed to teach. Even the final discourse has become a "Vichar-Duty or Vichar-Seva". 
There was time when we used to look forward to listen to the Vichaars of the 'saints' with shradhaa and devotion. But now, the Vichaar or the final discourse from the dais has become just a duty - being performed in rotation by different members of the congregation. It is not looked upon with respect or reverence anymore - because now it has been named as ‘Vichaar duty’ or Vichaar Seva’. 
The word ‘duty’ or Seva creates a different psychological effect on the minds of the listeners - and subconsciously – it is not taken or absorbed with reverence. The spiritual discourses; directions and teachings have turned into a ritualistic duty for both - the speakers and the listeners. Though, everyone is equal and should be respected and treated as equal – yet, in the eyes or minds of the listeners, one person is standing in the parking lot, another in the shoe room, yet another one doing the secretary ship and one sitting on the dais to do the Vichaar. Each one is performing the duty that has been assigned to them. Then how can we expect the same respect for the preachers and the same outcomes of their preaching as it used to be? 
For example, assign a duty to some students to speak on a topic on a certain day. Some might prepare their speech with the intention of a better performance and some others may not - and one by one they all deliver their lecture in front of the class. Everyone in the audience – the class mates, as well as the teacher, would be judging them as to who was good and who was not – who performed well and who did not – or who was better than others etc. No one is listening with the intention of learning. 
But on the other hand, if someone is appointed as a teacher and is sent out to teach, his intent as well as the intention of the students would be very different. He would behave differently because he knows he has to speak and act in a certain way to earn his respect and honor. He would also keep in mind what not to do – so he doesn’t lose his respect and reputation. At the same time, the students would listen to him with respect - with the intention of learning - not judging.
The same could be true with today’s youth’s attitude towards their parents or elders. All over the world, all parents sacrifice their own desires and time to provide the best for their children – to create a better future for the children. But when the young generation starts feeling that whatever their parents did for them – was their duty as parents – that they did what they were supposed to do, the feeling changes and there is not much love or respect left towards the parents anymore. 
Similarly, if the parents also did everything for their children simply as a duty – without love or feeling of sacrifice – the mutual feelings would be very different. According to the psychologists, the children who grow up in such environment behave very differently. 
Undoubtedly, on the Aadhyaatmik level - on the basic spiritual level, we all are one. Everyone is equal - but yet, there are always some distinctions to be followed. Two Gyani Mahanpurush - one a soldier and the other a captain or a colonel - although, as saints, they are not different at all but yet they have to act and be treated properly in order to maintain the discipline and for the organization of army to work properly. 
Parents and children have their own respective roles to perform. How can a household run smoothly by switching their roles casually on day to day basis? 
Receiving the ‘Brahm-Gyan’– the ‘God- knowledge’ is considered the highest form of learning. According to the Bhagavad Gita, after receiving this Gyana – there is nothing more left to be learned (in the field of spirituality). In the earlier days, bestowing the ‘Gyan’ was considered the highest form of teaching – to be conferred upon others by a revered saint. It was a sign of Sainthood. Unfortunately, bestowing Gyan has also been termed as a mere ‘duty’ now. 
These days, quite often we hear phrases like:
“Who is doing the Vichaar duty next week?
“Whose duty is to give Gyan today?”
“Is it your duty to do the Vichaar today or to give Gyana?”
Or even : "Hey! Isn't your duty to do the Vichar today? You are late. Hurry up and go on the stage."
Few times I have noticed, especially in the Sangats outside India - when a new person comes to Sangat and asks someone "who is this Mahatma ji sitting on the stage?"
The answer given many times is: "Oh. He is just a member of our Sangat. It's his or her duty to sit there and deliver the discourse today. We do it in rotation."
And the newcomer thinks: So, he is not a Mahatma? His duty is just to sit on the dais and have people touch his feet? To have people do Namaskar to him? 
Expressions like these do not implement any feelings of reverence. Hence the outcome of such acts would be quite different than it used to be when the person sitting on the stage – delivering discourse and bestowing the Gyan was seen as a Mahatma - a Saint. 
I remember Sant Amar Singh ji Patiala used to say that Sadh-Sangat means company of Saints or a Saadhu. If there is no Mahatma - no Saadhu in the congregation then how can it be called a Saadh-Sangat? 
Undoubtedly - the person executing the activities of a Preacher should certainly do it without ego – with love, kindness and humility – and with complete devotion towards the Satguru. But no one can gain any spiritual wisdom from them if they don’t see them as Saints and if the preachers do not present themselves as Saints.

In order to do all that, one has to become a true Saint. 

Therefore, in order to bring the ‘good ol’ days’ back - if we really want to bring back the ‘Shehanshah Yug’, then we must bring that old system back. We need to create new saints - to groom the disciples to become - not just the followers or preachers, but true Saints. At the same time, as an individual, we need to strive to become a Gyani Saint rather than becoming a mere follower.

We need to change the system from both ends. Complaining and blaming one side or the other is not going to change anything.

                                    ‘Rajan Sachdeva’

Note:  As a lifelong follower and well-wisher of the Mission - 
these are my personal views based on my personal observations and experience. 
It’s not a criticism or complaint against any one individual or the management as whole. As I said earlier: 

We Are All Responsible for the change that has happened
                                               and  
We Are All Responsible for the change we want to bring about. 


22 comments:

  1. Thank you so much for writing this message. These words are so valuable as they are written by someone who not only experienced Shehenshah jis yug but also contributed to make that Yug what it is remembered as.

    I sincerely hope this brings a change - first and foremost within myself. May the seeker in each of us come to life.

    Thank you again uncle ji... Dnj

    ReplyDelete
  2. Being a learner you taught us the lessons to be lived to be in the state what Shehanshah Ji has blessed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Also the lesson reminds the discourse of Satguru Mata Sudiksha Ji Maharaj that selflessly surrender can bring back the era of Shehanshah.
      Thank you so much once again Sant Ji

      Delete
  3. Thanks for writing this blog Rev. Rajan Ji. Every word in this blog when understood with the intent of learning and improving can act as a definite guide to bring back Shahenshah Ji's yug .... I pray that I understand and implement these life lessons that you have shared with us ....

    Pls continue writing and sharing your experiences. Its only if the current generation learns from the past that we can improve else we will not make progress.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thank you Datta ji, As I said in the article, my intent is simply to bring back what we had before - because that is what the Satguru wants.
    To do that - first We need to realize what was different - why was it different and how to bring it back.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Well said and agreed. However I think in the new management system this might be a difficult to uphold although it is right, because they try to involve more people. Numbers are more important than genuineness. Quality vs quantity , we all should be going for quality and quantity will take care of itself but we try to address quantity and lose quality. 🌺🙏

    ReplyDelete
  6. Well said Uncle ji. Honest and informative. I think that this blog was a long time coming. I remember talking about these topics with you from years back. If I can just add a few points.

    Firstly, I think that titles are thrown around too easily. I remember sitting in sangat many times listening to the stage secretary call speakers to the podium by referring to everyone as Reverend so-and-so. Reverend is title or form of address to members of the clergy, someone who has trained in scripture either academically and/or through the apprentice type program that you very clearly described in your blog. Someone who is revered because of their knowledge in scripture. Yet today everyone is a “Reverend” who speaks at the podium. I remember once when an English newcomer was at the sangat and asked me if the whole building was filled with priests since everyone was a “Reverend”. We should respect these titles and only use them where appropriate and earned. The language we use will define our thoughts and perspective of our world.

    Secondly, the sangat has grown faster the Management can control it. New Bhawans are opened for the sake of growth and numbers before there are properly trained teachers to lead the new flock. The “quantity over quality” phrase you used is quite correct. When you have so-called regional spiritual leaders who are not properly trained in scripture and life experiences you will get a lost congregation. The phrase “the blind leading the blind” comes to mind. This is also why you see inconsistencies among answers given by leaders from different cities on similar topics.

    A possible solution to this would be to create an academic College or University to teach new members theology and proper practice. The Mission is too big to go back to the purely “apprentice” type program to teach the new leaders. Also there probably are not many older leaders left that went through the old “apprenticeship” program. There has to be a formal teaching method to ensure that the correct knowledge is taught and passed on, the message is consistent, and proper titles are earned and not just given away. The deserved respect will follow.

    (Sorry for the length….. long comment for a long blog)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Thank you Manminder ji for sharing your valuable thoughts on this topic.
    I agree that sometimes certain titles are added during announcements that do not make much sense to others.
    As you mentioned, an academic type of scriptural teaching program is definitely a need of the time. But along with the study of scriptures – a practical training program for living a simple and humble saintly life-style is also very important. As I mentioned in the blog, the saints in the past lived a simple life - without flashy dresses and expressively luxurious life-style, which also impressed the audiences along with their detailed, in-depth knowledge of the scriptures.
    Thanks for your comments again and please keep sharing your wisdom.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Totally agree with your wonderful article. It is the best I have read about Shenshah ji era. In an era of ‘well wishers’ who do not wish to join the journey of sincere devotion and dedicatation to Truth but only wish others devotees well, it is important Gyan parchar is highlighted further with zeal and humility in daily life to inspire full participation in spreading Truth. The humility to learn from Saints is vital in gurmat. As satguru mataji said recently ‘youth have josh but elders have hosh’. I pray may the rich legacy of spiritual apprenticeship flourish so the weeds of negative thinking and pessimistic attitudes is eradicated in hearts. Humbly Surjit

    ReplyDelete
  9. A historic snapshot in time which talks about the reasons of surrender or samarpan.

    I hope the Mandal reads this and looks deeper into how we can come up with realisitc, tangible and timely solutions to make this Spirituality happen.

    Thanks Uncle Ji

    Dhan Nirankar Ji

    ReplyDelete
  10. since sep 2014 when firstly Baba ji spoke about "shenshah yug" was while giving adieu to Rajmata ji after her death .. we forget what Baba ji said emotionally before praying for return of "Shenshah yug" .... he categorically said that mission has got polluted by desires of positions ... we had best opportunity then .. all positions or post holders could have withdrawn unconditionally then and asked Sadguru to restructure mission as he would have desired... and given our testimony that we wish for bhagti and Guru but not for positions or posts in mission ...

    We still try to measure Mission progress which is purely spiritual by material means ... we can only measure spirituality with spirituality.... no of bhawans or maya can not determine our progress but number of pure souls who are pure examples of gurus messages can only do so .....

    so it is rightfully asked .. who is responsible ? so if i am still considering my becoming adhikari is more important then becoming "dass bhagat" .... then i m responsible .... because my guru preferred me becoming bhagat and not adhikari ...

    do kadam edr do kadam udr jivan viarth na ho jaye ... satguru ke rabbi vachno ka mann mana arth na ho jaye ...bhagti ko tolay maya se asa samarth na ho jaye .....

    thanks for the write up and being honest

    dhan nirankar ji

    ReplyDelete
  11. Dearest Rajan ji, thank you for this informative observation and insight into what Shahenshah ji's yug was all about. So many times, we have heard this era talked about but never has the core of that era been discussed. What were the dynamics? What were the seekers like? You have in this write up made it completely known. This is the first time, this era has been talked about with clarity.
    The 'apprentice' approach is very interesting and I think this will be very helpful. Understanding what it is to be a saint, how to be a realized being, living a simple life are all things that isn't really discussed in sangat. Also, questions aren't really encouraged. If you ask questions then people see it as a criticism (even when worded nicely!). Having this approach, will definitely help our young saints.
    In the west for sure, I think we are losing the generation that I belong to. I am 31 years old and most of the youth around my age, who are 10 - 15 years younger than me, simply do not understand the philosophy. They don't really learn much and that is not their fault entirely. One, the language is a big barrier. The bal sangat always tell me that when vichar is in english then it is easy for them to concentrate and learn. If it is in hindi or punjabi then they switch off and get bored.
    What you mentioned about vichar duty or sewa is very true too. If we see it as a teacher coming then we are more enthusiastic. In fact, Brahma Kumaris have this approach and it is working. I remember growing up as a young kid and even I was excited to know that Giani Joginder Singh ji is visiting, or Mann Singh Mann ji is visiting, Shastri ji etc. It would make us happy despite the language barrier. All we knew was that we were going to learn something. Our parents made sure we understood and our car journeys home would be discussing what we learned.
    An important aspect that you have highlighted is that meditation on Nirankar has to be encouraged. How can one talk about the Truth if it is never contemplated upon, not meditated upon, not felt. Personally, meditation has helped me and is helping me.
    The next thing I am going to say may not be appreciated by some saints but it is important. The media discourses from HQ should stop so that local parchar can be encouraged and it can grow. I love Baba Ji's vichars and see the importance but how are we going to learn from saints in our own local sangats if we listen to them once or twice in 2/3 months.
    Regular discussions should be encouraged and reading scriptures should be encouraged also. This will happen only if we see saints express this in their vichars.
    Sorry for the long comment. Whatever you have written, I agree with 100% and will support you in any way to make this happen. Thank you again Rajan ji for this.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Thank you Rahul ji for your detailed additional thoughts - which are self-explanatory - I don't need to add anything more to it - except Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  13. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I can't express in words how much value this blog, along with the comments of saints, has for me. As each day continues to pass, His Holiness Baba Ji's vision is becoming more and more clearer to me. I pray unto the divine holy feet of Her Holiness Satguru Mata Sudiksha Ji Maharaj to give our elders a long and extremely healthy life, for them to continue showing us the way on how to truly become the mission that Satguru has desired. Please bless us that we may utilize the 'gyan', the key to all doors, that Satguru has put emphasis upon in one of her recent discourses. My sincerest gratitude for this blog, Rev. Uncle Rajan Ji. Dhan Nirankar Ji.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Dhan Nirankar Uncleji, this is one of the most clarifying explanations, if not the most clarifying, I've ever gotten about what is truly meant by "bringing back the 'Shehanshah Yug'". This is highly introspective for someone who was born into the mission and not someone who got attracted to it for spirituality. I'd like to thank you for not only giving me an answer but also showing me the way on how I can contribute to bringing back the Yug that my Lord has been asking for years. Thank you!

    ReplyDelete
  16. With due respect to Shahenshah ji yug and reference to Satguru Baba Hardev singh ji reference vichar, I personally feel that every Yug or era has its uniqueness. Rather than bring back the old yug of Shahenshaji ( it is like bringing back the stone age ) we should concentrate more on maintaining the legacy of all past satgurus ( Not only Shahenshaji ) and keep on refreshing, adjusting, accommodating and being like saint according to new era and current situation without compromising on the missionary basics and adding on new features / feathers in the upcoming era by walking with current world. Thank you.Dhan Nirankrji

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Mr. Anonymous, for your additional thoughts and bringing out those points.
      I am sure you and everyone else must know that the term 'Shehanshah Yug' was not invented by me. It has been talked about for quite some time now to bring that era back.
      I completely agree with you that all the past Satgurus should be remembered and paid EQUAL respect including the current Satguru and not just the one.
      I don’t know how you got the idea that I am in favor of going backward in time. I also could not understand why and how did you compare the Shehanshah yug with the stone age. The examples I gave were about the principles they followed – not about bringing back the culture of 1950s and 60s.
      It's good to bring changes and introduce new features according to the changing times - however, there are certain basic universal principles such as Honesty, truthfulness, compassion, love and respect for all - especially for elders and teachers - modesty and kindness etc. do not and should not change with time. The purpose of this article was only to bring out these points and not to show the superiority of Baba Avtar Singh ji or ANY ONE Satguru of the past over the others.

      Delete
  17. This topic of shahenshah ji yug has been going around sangats since 2014, vichars, topics even articles find its references ... it was not at all refered in context of past but surely got refered bcoz of golden legacy of dedicated saints then .. lighthouses

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are right Vikrant ji. In fact it was Satguru Baba Hardev Singh ji who said he wanted to bring back the Shehanshah Yug. So, it is now our duty to see what was different in those days and how can we bring that system back.

      Delete

Itnay Betaab kyon hain - Why so much restlessness?

 Itnay betaab - itnay beqaraar kyon hain  Log z aroorat say zyaada hoshyaar  kyon hain  Moonh pay to sabhi dost hain lekin Peeth peechhay d...