When we got home after the 23rd February Birthday Sangat - aka Guru Pooja / Baba Hardev Singh ji's Birthday (observed on Sunday
February 26th) - I found a package in my mail box. It was a gift from a friend who recently came back from India. There were two books in that package – one of them was ‘Ashtavakra Gita’– written exactly in the form that I was looking for – with the original Sanskrit text and its word to word meaning, along with brief but precise translation.
I was quite excited to find what I was looking for, and randomly opened the book and looked at the page in front of me. It was the eighteenth Shloka of chapter one.
साकारमनृतं विद्धि निराकारं तु निश्चलम
एतत्तत्वोपदेशेन न पुनर्भव सम्भवः
Saakaaram-Anritam viddhi Niraakaaram tu Nicshchalam
Etat-Tattvopadeshna Na Punarbhav-Sambhavah
“Know that which has ‘form’ - to be false.
And the Formless to be changeless.
Through this ‘Tattva-Gyaana’ (true knowledge),
You shall escape the cycle of re-birth.”
That which remains changeless in the past, present and future is the ‘Real’ and that which was not from beginning and will not be in the future, but seems to exist temporarily in a certain period of time, is ‘unreal’.
Regardless of how much physical and emotional value we place upon an object, which has a physical form is changeable and perishable. Whereas only Nirankar, the Formless, remains unchanged and constant.
I was astonished, and had to read the shloka again.
It was a moment of ‘soul-searching’ for me – to look deep into my heart to see what do I really believe in...
Nirankar or Sakaar?
Though a follower of the 'Nirankari' Mission, what do I really value more...
The ‘Formless or a particular ‘Form’?...
Accept the present or believe in the past?
I thought…. What a co-incidence it was - that opening this sacred book randomly right after coming back from the above mentioned event- I would accidentally come across this particular Shloka.
But then...
I started to wonder….
Was it really a co-incidence or a message from ‘Beyond’?
‘Rajan Sachdeva’
I was quite excited to find what I was looking for, and randomly opened the book and looked at the page in front of me. It was the eighteenth Shloka of chapter one.
साकारमनृतं विद्धि निराकारं तु निश्चलम
एतत्तत्वोपदेशेन न पुनर्भव सम्भवः
Saakaaram-Anritam viddhi Niraakaaram tu Nicshchalam
Etat-Tattvopadeshna Na Punarbhav-Sambhavah
“Know that which has ‘form’ - to be false.
And the Formless to be changeless.
Through this ‘Tattva-Gyaana’ (true knowledge),
You shall escape the cycle of re-birth.”
That which remains changeless in the past, present and future is the ‘Real’ and that which was not from beginning and will not be in the future, but seems to exist temporarily in a certain period of time, is ‘unreal’.
Regardless of how much physical and emotional value we place upon an object, which has a physical form is changeable and perishable. Whereas only Nirankar, the Formless, remains unchanged and constant.
I was astonished, and had to read the shloka again.
It was a moment of ‘soul-searching’ for me – to look deep into my heart to see what do I really believe in...
Nirankar or Sakaar?
Though a follower of the 'Nirankari' Mission, what do I really value more...
The ‘Formless or a particular ‘Form’?...
Accept the present or believe in the past?
I thought…. What a co-incidence it was - that opening this sacred book randomly right after coming back from the above mentioned event- I would accidentally come across this particular Shloka.
But then...
I started to wonder….
Was it really a co-incidence or a message from ‘Beyond’?
‘Rajan Sachdeva’